Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:57:06 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are 	non-empty
Message-ID: <20090503155706.GA23434@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <49FD3728.1050806@bonhard.uklinux.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49FD3728.1050806@bonhard.uklinux.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:18:16AM +0100, Fergus wrote:
>Just noticed that after the recent unison upgrade there exists a file
> 	/usr/bin/unison
>Also just noticed (but this must have occurred a while ago - 30/03/09
>maybe, the date of a TeX upgrade?) that there now exists a directory
> 	/usr/lib/texmf/
>with deep non-empty subdirectory structure.  Is it the case for [1.7]
>that both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ should be empty as for [1.5]?
>
>Possibly the texmf/ packaging issue has been corrected in subsequent
>upgrades and so /usr/lib/texmf/ can be deleted without compromising
>functionality; but I think the appearance of /usr/bin/unison is very
>new.

How about humoring our need for details by providing cygcheck output
as mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html ?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/