X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49FB5F2B.1080400@gmail.com> References: <49FB47AE.3010401@bonhard.uklinux.net> <20090501191256.GE11295@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <49FB5F2B.1080400@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [1.5] v. [1.7] unison: version clash? From: "Mark J. Reed" To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > =C2=A0I must be feeling a little "special" today. =C2=A0Why should there = be any > relationship between 1.5 package numbers and 1.7 package numbers? I think that traditionally, if you found two Cygwin packages in the wild without any other context, and they had the same filename, they were ipso facto the same package. Unless someone messed up somewhere. Here we have two packages with the same filename that are not in fact the same package. Ergo, someone messed up somewhere. :) --=20 Mark J. Reed -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/