X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49FB6051.807@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 21:49:21 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ps -ef difference linux/cygwin (arguments) References: <20090429081129.GA44103@xs4all.nl> <20090429144728.GB12904@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090429150130.GC12904@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20090501145221.GA6507@amd64.of.nowhere> <20090501181122.GD11295@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com William Sutton wrote: > I'll point out that there is also a significant difference between a > direct response and gratuitous insults. Then perhaps you shouldn't have responded to the direct response: > Use "procps" rather than "ps". with gratuitous insults: > speaking for myself and a lot of other people if you feel that's a problem. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/