X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:38:53 +0200
To: "Chris Green" <chris.h.green@gmail.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: kerberos tools (kinit, etc) and kerberos-aware openssh in cygwin?
From: "Matthias Andree" <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <49F72D97.4020300@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <op.us5by3g31e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>
In-Reply-To: <49F72D97.4020300@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.64 (Win32)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Am 28.04.2009, 18:23 Uhr, schrieb Chris Green <chris.h.green@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have searched through the main mailing list archives and not come up
> with anything that seems even partially relevant except perhaps a recent
> email regarding LSA which did not seem to address my exact question. Is
> it possible for Cygwin to include a kerberos implementation (MIT or
> Heimdal, for instance) along with kerberos support compiled into the
> main openssh package? Are there any issues here that I'm not aware of?
> I've tried to compile the MIT package a couple of times without success
> but I don't know how much work it would be to get it going?
>
> I am aware of several scientists in my field (particle physics research)
> who rely on Cygwin and their old method of "getting around" was a
> one-off compile of a very old version of ssh that now does not talk to
> modern sshd servers properly provided by someone on an as-is basis
> several years ago. The currently-packaged openssh would work just fine
> if it were compiled with a set of kerberos libraries.
>
> Any help or suggestions for alternatives or existing documentation
> gratefully received.

Hi Chris,

the best alternative I'm aware of and I have been using successfully for  
some weeks now (to the extent possible in PuTTY, which has some rough  
edges in Unicode and screen line drawing support) is a patched PuTTY  
snapshot with MIT Kerberos support, courteously provided by Matthew Loar.  
For details, please see <http://matthew.loar.name/software/putty/>.

HTH

-- 
Matthias Andree

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

