X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49EFF80D.6000300@lisec-sw.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:09:33 +1000 From: Stefan Walter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: MS-DFSR conflict with cygwin file permissions References: <49EFBEA8.8070609@lisec-sw.com> <49EFC69E.3060402@cygwin.com> <49EFD253.40107@lisec-sw.com> <49EFE9E2.104@cygwin.com> In-Reply-To: <49EFE9E2.104@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Larry Hall (Cygwin) schrieb: > Stefan Walter wrote: >> Larry Hall (Cygwin) schrieb: >>> Stefan Walter wrote: >>>> If you redirect output in cmd.exe to a file (echo "Hello world..." >>>> >output.txt), then the file "output.txt" have the file permissions >>>> inherited from the parent folder. >>>> >>>> If you redirect output in bash.exe to a file, then the file >>>> permissions are restricted. >>>> >>>> I need this solved, because the current given permission conflict >>>> with the Microsoft DFSr. >>>> >>>> Is there a way to create files with permissions inherited from >>>> parent folder? >>> >>> Read the section about NT security in the User's Guide >>> and then try setting >>> 'nontsec' >>> in your CYGWIN environment variable >>> . >>> >> That was a great hint. >> >> I tried it now with "CYGWIN=nontsec tty" and the permission are as i >> wanted it. >> >> One more question with that. In the guides for "sshd" they always >> recommend "CYGWIN=ntsec tty". Do you expect a problem if i run with >> nontsec? > > Beyond the loss of the POSIX permissions, no. You should check your > 'sshd_config' file and make sure 'StrictModes' is set to 'no' though. > 'tty' is not required for 'sshd' > The loss of the POSIX permissions is fine for me. But what is then the purpose of tty in the CYGWIN variable? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/