X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49E5E865.1030005@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:00:05 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [openssh] unnatended instalation + forcing service account References: <20090415083139.GI15443@calimero.vinschen.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Julio Costa wrote: > Came to think of it, there is also another possibility (and a simpler > one), and that is to code the --yes option on the ssh-host-config to > use the (new) -f option to the csih, avoiding coding the extra > parameter (--force) just for this behavior. After all, this behavior > should be required for --yes and possibly is not very useful if > ssh-host-config is not invoked with --yes. > What do you think? That's what I did for iu-config; -y | --yes ) csih_auto_answer=yes opt_force=yes ;; -n | --no ) csih_auto_answer=no opt_force=yes ;; I then used $opt_force to determine whether -f should be passed to csih_select_privileged_username. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/