X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:43:36 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcc4: missing atomic builtins?
Message-ID: <20090330084336.GO12738@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <49CD325C.5030109@users.sourceforge.net> <49CF2163.3060602@gmail.com> <416096c60903290155g34878e17gf3311de983a659be@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <416096c60903290155g34878e17gf3311de983a659be@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mar 29 09:55, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >  Well, I guess the question is, what's the minimum level of CPU we want to
> > support, and I can configure the next version --with-arch that level, and as
> > long as it's >=486 we'll be ok.  I think the question is mainly "686, or is
> > there any reason to have 586 as the minimum supported CPU"?
> 
> Windows 2000 and XP only require 586. Can't imagine many people using
> them on a Pentium machine though, and the 686 CMOV instruction would
> be nice to have. Also, should -with-tune be set to something recent?

The last i586 was built in 1999 and had a 300 MHz clock rate.  The i686
has been introduced in 1995 and in 1999 the P3 had a minimum clock rate
of 450 MHz.

I don't think we really need a default compiler and a default installation
sticking to the old i586 design any longer.  And, btw, is there any
Linux distro still using a i586 compiler?

If there are really still i586 users out there, hey, it's all available
in sources.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

