X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:47:52 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcc4: extern inline vs. c99 Message-ID: <20090326104752.GL12738@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <49CAC59C.4080306@users.sourceforge.net> <49CAF18F.5000506@gmail.com> <49CAF394.3080705@gmail.com> <49CB0C1E.2050901@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CB0C1E.2050901@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mar 26 00:01, Yaakov S wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dave Korn wrote: > > Dave Korn wrote: > >> See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/threads.html#01088 for background > >> and a solution. > > You mean like this (attached)? > > > Oh, but see also: > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00326.html > > > > for an important bugfix to that solution. > > Is that relevant here, given that __ntoh{l,s} is only used if !defined > __NO_INLINE__ ? Patch applied. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/