Message-ID: <49BE550E.4000806@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:33:02 +0000
From: Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [1.7] BUG: heap_chunk_in_mb=1536 breaks expect.
References: <49BD86E2.1080208@gmail.com> <20090316094119.GP9322@calimero.vinschen.de> <20090316131955.GD23977@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20090316131955.GD23977@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:41:19AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> The code handling heap_chunk_in_mb hasn't changed at all since 1.5.25,
>> except for the registry location where it's loaded from.  I'm wondering
>> if the mere size of the heap chunk is enough here to disturb
>> functionality which requires more memory in 1.7 than in 1.5.  For
>> instance, practically all file operations need more memory now (buffers
>> for conversion to UNICODE, enough room for long paths).  And 1.5 Gigs +
>> sizeof all DLLs + sizeof executable is quite easily filling up the 2
>> Gigs virtual mem size for the process.
> 
> I wonder if we should just nuke this setting entirely.  It shouldn't really
> be tremendously useful anymore.

  Well, let me check whether it's possible to link libgcj without it first...

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/