X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49B73DE9.40405@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:28:25 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [1.7] Samba file cp References: <49B69EBB.4020405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Brian Ford wrote: >>> $ ls -i //SambaServer/share/TestFile >>> 3779159704 //SambaServer/share/TestFile >>> E1416698 >>> $ ls -i //SamabaServer/share/TestFile >>> 3881062408 //SambaServer/share/TestFile E7545008 > $ ls -i //SambaServer/share/TestFile > 1277840537592983992 //SambaServer/share/TestFile > > $ ls -i //SambaServer/share/TestFile > 1277840537592983992 //SambaServer/share/TestFile > > Inodes are consistent. 11BBCD32DAD2F1B8 No obvious pattern there. Then again, if those first two commands were about ten seconds apart, the inode numbers would make sense as 100-ns resolution timestamps. Wonder if this is a changed struct alignment/packing problem between different compiler versions here somewhere? cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/