X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: "Akakima" <akakima33@gmail.com>
Subject:  Re: side effects after installing gcc-3.4.4.999
Date:  Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:52:06 -0500
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <gogodu$j1i$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <gofr4i$s1t$1@ger.gmane.org> <49AB7AE0.9040600@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-To: "Akakima" <akakima33@gmail.com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com


"Greg Chicares" <gchicares@sbcglobal.net> 
> If gcc version 3.x is what you want, why not just downgrade
> from 3.4.4-999 to gcc-3.4.4-3? AIUI, the only difference
> between the two is something you don't want:
> 

That's what i did (downgraded).
Still, i wanted to make someone aware of the fact that the update was
the cause of a change in behaviour.

> Alternatively, you might prefer to use mingw.org's native gcc.

I use both cygwin and mingw.
cygwin have more programs and a better "unix" support.
mingw has no dependance on a dedicated dll.




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/