X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:03:22 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: umount/mount issues Message-ID: <20090302110322.GG10046@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Mar 1 20:40, Karl M wrote: > For cygwin umount, -v is version display (-V on Linux? -v is verbose). That's the same for mount. There's no verbosity for these commands anyway. > For mount -m I get the following > > $ mount -m > C:/Cygwin/bin /usr/bin ntfs binary 0 0 > C:/Cygwin/lib /usr/lib ntfs binary 0 0 > C:/Cygwin / ntfs binary 0 0 > none /c cygdrive binary,posix=0 0 0 > > where the /c in the last line should be / > > This came from an fstab of (I know...I have done the evil / prefix for years and am hooked.) Sigh. Why are you guys insisting on using this prefix. I fixed mount to show this correctly, but you still should feel guilty. > Other than that, things worked great so far. > > It is wonderful to see all of my Cygwin processes again after moving to Vista. Yeah, I'm quite pleased with this one, too. Hopefully Microsoft won't restrict this specific usage of global shared memory in a later Windows release again. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/