X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <49A618F6.7080701@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:22:14 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: file-5.00-1 References: <499E2B9A.5030907@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090220095916.GA759@calimero.vinschen.de> <499EB5A6.5000707@gmail.com> <499EBABE.8080303@gmail.com> <499EC6E5.5000408@gmail.com> <49A5ACDF.4020001@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49A5ACDF.4020001@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Dave Korn wrote: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-07/msg00372.html > > So I believe now this is a symptom of a buggy ld already fixed upstream. > I'll try the testcase again against one of my CVS builds of binutils and > report back, but I expect it will fix the problem and rebase will no longer > alter the unlinked weak null-initialised pointer. Confirmed. (This has implications which I will pursue in the GCC4 thread on -apps.) cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/