X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:32:48 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: file-5.00-1 Message-ID: <20090220143248.GA6864@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <499E2B9A.5030907@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20090220095916.GA759@calimero.vinschen.de> <499EB5A6.5000707@gmail.com> <499EBABE.8080303@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499EBABE.8080303@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Feb 20 14:14, Dave Korn wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >> Apparently. I rebased the DLL alone and afterwards file simply stopped > >> working. The DLL has a base address of 0x6a500000. Even rebasing to > >> the very same address results in a coredump! > > > Nope, I can't reproduce it yet. > > I can now, but not by rebasing to the exact same address; did something just > go amiss in your testing of that particular case maybe? I have no idea, sorry. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/