X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_64 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <498C56F3.4030201@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:27:47 -0800 From: Tim Prince Reply-To: tprince@computer.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [OT] Vista feedback References: <4194a74fe2e6f91c44e93a34d6fb8550@mail.smartmobili.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Vincent R. wrote: > Ok finally I got my answers, I am cross-compiling and everything is so > SLOWWWWWWWW > that I will have to install Windows XP ... > Is it because of the couple laptop(Dell XPS M1530)/Vista or does it come > from Vista itself ? You didn't say whether you have sufficient RAM, why you would not consider 64-bit or SSD if you are serious about Vista. Not that we want your answer. cygwin is agonizingly slow for many jobs, even on XP SP3. You'll see the reasons in the archives of this group. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/