X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:14:16 +0100 From: Carsten Hey To: Sjors Gielen , debian-devel@lists.debian.org, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Hosting the Debian/kCygwin port? Message-ID: <20090121101416.GG15594@foghorn.stateful.de> References: <49751189.5050609@dazjorz.com> <20090121094825.GF15594@foghorn.stateful.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090121094825.GF15594@foghorn.stateful.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Sender: c.hey@web.de Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Sjors Gielen wrote: > ... but the Cygwin packages are different from their Debian > counterparts (think patches), and I'm not sure how that happens with > other ports. debian-devel, is this a problem? No, this is no problem. Debian GNU/kFreeBSD also uses additional patches. Carsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/