X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <496992C3.4010607@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:33:39 -0600
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: pedantic/misled/confused/passive-aggressive (was Re: MinTTY 0.3.3)
References: <20090111040508.GA8342@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20090111040508.GA8342@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Christopher Faylor wrote:
 > Just to contribute something useful: Chuck Wilson, if you are reading
> this, am I correct in assuming that you don't enjoy maintaining the
> Windows version of rxvt?  If so, should we consider deprecating rxvt in
> favor of MinTTY when MinTTY becomes a real package?

Or just switch rxvt to the regular X11 version w/o all the libW11 hackery?


Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAklpksMACgkQpiWmPGlmQSP9KwCfcRpbeWRn2zJXiwuWQDJkgNeL
5J4AnRvIXPpUswp6a6UNTxGMRudYIf19
=KICh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/