X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BARRACUDA_BRBL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: MinTTY 0.3.3 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:21:42 -0700 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <495917BA.1090401@gmail.com> <49613928.503@gmail.com> <4966897B.2010805@gmail.com> <49671BCF.7010808@alcatel-lucent.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: X-Stationery: 0.4.8.12 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Michael Lemke wrote: > I just don't get it. What's wrong with rxvt? I've been using it for > years as my only terminal for cygwin and never understood why it isn't > the default. While I agree, rxvt does have problems with programs written for the DOS style console output (e.g. cleartool from IBM/Rational Clearcase and others). Besides isn't it written somewhere that true Unix defaults must be ugly and brain dead? 1/2 ;-) -- Andrew DeFaria Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/