Message-ID: <4961C7FD.2000509@bonhard.uklinux.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:42:37 +0000
From: Fergus <fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin ML <cygwin@cygwin.com>
CC: Fergus <fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net>
Subject: Cygwin on a mobile drive: formatting options?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Rather than install and maintain Cygwin on several desktop machines that 
I use, I travel from one to another with one copy of Cygwin on a mobile 
drive. This is formatted FAT32 as I don't need the grief NTFS provides 
for file access and attribution. A 40G drive is glacier-shift slow, a 
100G drive was lightning, and the latest 500G drive is slow. All 3 are 
formatted using Linux fdisk + mkdosfs, as this is so reliable. To my 
surprise all 3 drives allow the user to select either FAT32 (option "b" 
in fdisk) or FAT32(LBA) (option "c"). ["Surprise" because naively I 
thought LBA was an engineering option restricted to large capacity 
magnetic drives only, and not solid state flash drives like the 40G.]
Question: Can anybody tell me whether "b" or "c" is better for access 
speed or offers any perceptible advantage over the other?
I don't mind being told to pursue this thread on cygwin-talk [but it is 
not intended to be "funny", apparently a requirement of that list] or 
being told that it is off-topic, in which case where should it be pursued?
Thank you.
Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/