X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Thorsten Kampe Subject: RE: source for tree command? Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:15:07 +0100 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <494584BC.1040302@osu.edu> <49458823.3060502@cygwin.com> <49459057.4050704@osu.edu> <5E25AF06EFB9EA4A87C19BC98F5C8753022A3455@core-email.int.ascribe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.71.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com * Phil Betts (Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:48:31 -0000)> > Steve Lefevre wrote on Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:02 PM:: > > > Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > >> Steve Lefevre wrote: > >>> Hello - > >>> I'm desperately looking for a source for the tree command in cygwin. > >>> It isn't listed separately in any of the package sources that I > >>> looked at. I tried googling and search the cygwin website, but they > >>> just return results for "source tree" or "filesystem tree" -- > >>> nothing about the tree command. > >>> > >>> Has in been abandoned from cygwin? > >> > >> I'd suggest you look for the package that the command is in, either > >> through or via 'cygcheck -p tree'. Neither of > >> these narrow things down very well for me to point you more directly > >> so I can only say that I would recommend that you > >> 'cygcheck -p $(which tree)' to see if that unearths a potential > >> package for you. Once you find it, fire up 'setup.exe' and make > >> sure you > >> choose the 'Src?' box for the package. The result will go in > >> '/usr/src'. > > > > Looks like my memory made something up -- Thorsten says it was never > > included in cygwin. That would make it difficult to find! > > > > I tried looking in the package search on the website, but of course I > > didn't find it. I thought it was due to ubiquity of the term 'tree', > > but it looks like it's because it just wasn't there. > > On my system: > > $ cygcheck -f $(which tree) > tree-1.5.0-EL-1 3 1/2 years outdated. Current version is 1.5.2.1 Thorsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/