X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:38:23 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygwin-1.7: linking difference Message-ID: <20081208093823.GA13860@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <123264.29476.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <123264.29476.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Dec 6 07:15, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Hi All, > following the Corinna request I tried to test the > building of my packages on cygwin-1.7 and I found this > slight difference when linking > > on cygwin 1.5 "-lcruft.dll" is accepted as form > to link versus cygcruft.dll > > while on 1.7 the outcome is: > > /bin/ld: cannot find -lcruft.dll > > of course if I modified the form "in -lcruft" > than everything is fine. > > Is it a intentional change ? I don't think this has to do with Cygwin 1.5 vs 1.7. This looks like a change in gcc4 vs gcc3 or in binutils. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/