Message-ID: <48F6A9D5.20900@cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:41:25 -0400
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Headers not found when gcc4 installed without gcc3
References: <48F648E0.7040807@cornell.edu> <024801c92f1b$46bacec0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
In-Reply-To: <024801c92f1b$46bacec0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

On 10/15/2008 7:10 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> there's no way on earth that installing Gcc-3 should
> cause any X-related headers to be pulled in.  Both setup.hints for gcc-core
> and gcc4-core pull in w32api, and that's it by the way of headers.
> 
>   Is it perhaps possible that your initial install failed to completely run
> and the second time round setup.exe got the missing bits anyway - only
> coincidentally at the same time as you installed gcc-core?

It's possible.  What puzzles me, though, is that the X11 headers were 
never missing; they were in /usr/X11R6/include all along.  [Maybe I 
didn't make that clear in my original post.]  It's just that those 
headers weren't found by the configure script.  So I thought that the 
installation of gcc-core might have done something to get the (already 
existing) headers into the search path for headers.  Is that impossible?

Ken

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/