X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:05:57 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: vim-7.2.2 compiled using --with-features=normal (not --with-features=huge) Message-ID: <20081009120557.GW9289@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Oct 8 11:00, Jeff V Stein wrote: > The recent 7.2.2 update for vim was compiled using a different > configure statement than the 7.2.1 release. As a result, many of the > previously enabled features have been dropped. > > >From the --version take it looks like --with-features=huge was changed > to --with-features=normal: > > vim-7.2.1: > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Aug 10 2008 10:52:25) > Compiled by corinna@cathi > Huge version without GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): > > vim-7.2.2: > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Sep 30 2008 14:47:11) > Compiled by corinna@cathi > Normal version without GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): > > Was this an intentional change? Not really. At one point I even might get it right. Thanks for the hint, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/