X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8  a=aDlhq6M52uSFWsQXvLwA:9 a=DxzTiUE2upD8_i3oQuwA:7  a=kd1SAMQu4keO0C_2K-Ds2wjTJ_4A:4 a=eDFNAWYWrCwA:10 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10
Message-ID: <48B9BABF.2020105@byu.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:25:19 -0600
From: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phil Smith <phil@voltage.com>
CC: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question
References: <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E06EA@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com>  <48B706FB.4CAE7693@dessent.net> <20080828203234.GB17369@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E0893@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com>  <2A9FABB3664AF8459CBADA1CE4E4024642D52EA2B1@DF-MASTIFF-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>  <20080830195510.GB20923@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E091B@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com> <48B9B43E.1050407@byu.net> <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E091C@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com>
In-Reply-To: <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E091C@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Phil Smith on 8/30/2008 3:06 PM:
> But you've (seemingly inadvertently?) answered the question, 

Nope, my reply was not inadvertent (I mentioned quoting on purpose).

> 
> P.S. And no, I'm not going to get into a top-posting vs. inline discussion

We mention http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU for a reason, because that's
what we prefer on this list.  By top-posting this comment, you've gone and
done exactly what you said you weren't going to do, so you're not
representing yourself very well.

> I did remove your email address below, however, including the raw copy in your sig...

Thanks.  However, that raw copy is something I chose.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR states: "Of course, there may be
other raw e-mail addresses in messages, e.g., in signatures, but that's
the choice of the person sending the message."

We only ask that you take time to munge addresses in headers, without
worrying about sigs (although, if your mailer is truly RFC-compliant, any
text after a line containing only "-- ", such as my sig, would be
automatically omitted from your reply).

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAki5ur8ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDEUQCgsvUbXsEU+xAyFlvNAU7kGHWd
oLsAoMvdGwjZTNlDtTb8clMbmEZV6fkW
=nWjl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

