X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Trace: 65013585/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.74.17.85
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 79.74.17.85
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: johne53@tiscali.co.uk
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEEAEAftkhPShFV/2dsb2JhbACDf0e1cIFp
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,286,1217804400";     d="scan'208";a="65013585"
Message-ID: <003801c90904$35f2e600$4001a8c0@mycomputer>
From: "John Emmas" <johne53@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <551315.53147.qm@web82408.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: A newbie question about 3rd party libraries.
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:50:04 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Hi guys,

I noticed that the setup package for Cygwin includes (optionally) lots of
3rd party libraries.  For example, in the audio section, there are libraries
for flac, libogg. libesound etc. This raises a few obvious questions:-

1)  Am I right in assuming that these are supplied as pre-compiled binaries
with associated header files?

2)  Is the standard extension ".la" ('Cygwin\lib' seems to contain a lot of
".la" files).

3)  What about 'unavailable' libraries (for example libsndfile).  Is it
worth trying to download and build them myself - or have they been left out
deliberately for other reasons (e.g. incompatibility)?

Obviously, Cygwin is a work in progress so it's perfectly understandable
that the newest libraries might not have been ported yet.  But if a
library's been around for a long time (like libsndfile) and still isn't
included, is it best to assume there's a good reason for it - such as
somebody already realised that it wouldn't be compatible?

Thanks

John


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

