X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@thorstenkampe.de>
Subject:  Re: Cygwin 1.7 on a FLASH Drive
Date:  Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:36:37 +0200
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <g8j5uo$9ip$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <48AC5BBA.2010906@bmts.com> <48AC60AB.6000506@cygwin.com> <48AC62EE.9040604@bmts.com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

* Ralph Hempel (Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:31:10 -0400)
> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> > Ralph Hempel wrote:
> >> I'd like to have a complete Cygwin environment on a FLASH
> >> drive, but of course using that drive to compile stuff in
> >> my HOME directory will be awfully slow.
> > 
> > Why is that?
> 
> Creating, wand writing files is much slower on a FLASH
> drive than on a hard disk. Not a big problem for a few
> files here and there, but if I'm compiling gcc and binutils for
> cross compiling to an ARM (for example) it might be MUCH
> slower.

Then simply don't compile in your home directory...

Thorsten


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

