X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:21:34 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bug in cygcheck (1.7)
Message-ID: <20080819032134.GB4204@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <48A8188E.4030203@elite-systems.org> <20080817165425.GA3708@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <48A85BA5.20501@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <48A8E552.3070803@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20080818032220.GA28914@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <48A8F8A7.8080805@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20080818133930.GK21040@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080818141142.GA32164@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080818143410.GM21040@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080818164109.GA2384@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080818164109.GA2384@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:41:09PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:34:10PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Aug 18 10:11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:39:30PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> >So it's the FreeLibrary call which triggers the problem.  What I don't
>>> >understand so far is, why it does.
>>> 
>>> Does this have any effect?
>>
>>Unfortunately not, it doesn't even change the frequency in which it
>>occurs.  I can so far only fix the problem by avoiding to call
>>FreeLibrary.  Disabling the call to shared_destroy from dll_entry
>>doesn't help either.
>
>Did you try commenting out the stuff in DLL_THREAD_DETACH too?  Looking at
>the code, it *shouldn't* be an issue but if it was actually getting called
>there would be all sorts of repercussions.

I'd like to reproduce this since this is all basically code that I
wrote.  Corinna and Chuck could you privately send me your installed.db's
in private email?  Maybe if I use those I'll be able to see the problem.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

