X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:51:14 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Does anyone use insight on cygwin?
Message-ID: <20080805025114.GD13120@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20080804233810.GA13054@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <48979FCB.5090405@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48979FCB.5090405@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:33:15PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Does anyone actually use insight on Cygwin? 
>
> I do. I am a complete idiot when it comes to using gdb in "normal" mode. 
> Without insight, I'm lost.
>
>> Keith Seitz, the insight
>> maintainer, has recently made changes which will allow insight to work
>> with a non-special version of tcl/tk rather than the hacked version that
>> it had previously been built with.  That opens the door to building a
>> real version of tcl/tk for cygwin and linking insight to it.
>> Unfortunately, I believe that would mean that insight would need to run
>> in an X window rather than natively.
>
> Not a problem for me; I don't mind running an Xserver. And I routinely run 
> both cygwin's very old Xserver and the 'free' XMing version.
>
>
> However, I remember this issue came up several years ago. There were a few 
> arguments in favor of the hacked tcl/tk version of insight:
>
> (1) How do you debug the Xserver if your debugger depends on it?
>
> (2) Red Hat's paying customers expected a standalone debugger, and would 
> balk at a Xserver requirement.

Neither of the above is particularly important.  You have the same
problem using insight to debug an X server on linux.  And, if Red Hat
wants a standalone version they can certainly provide one.  It's a Red
Hat employee who is making the current changes to insight after all.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

