X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:16:06 +0100 (WEST)
From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk>
To: Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at>
cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: setup.exe needs package name selection filter
In-Reply-To: <4860D2C5.80700@x-ray.at>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0806241206480.13964@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>
References: <485AFB14.9090400@gmail.com> <20080620095103.3892@blackhawk>   <20080620005700.GB26573@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <485B02D9.8050806@gmail.com>   <000501c8d2c7$68afb690$2708a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>   <Pine.GSO.4.64.0806201235530.25299@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk>   <f60fe000806200523u1a7d6be3pf5c4f12f25c401f6@mail.gmail.com> <485BA49A.7090109@byu.net>   <f60fe000806200632i1c5e0668le025c76c06568627@mail.gmail.com>   <485BDF91.4050006@cygwin.com> <20080620195403.GA31976@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0806231012570.8362@brains.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk> <4860D2C5.80700@x-ray.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Reini Urban wrote:

> Hugh Sasse schrieb:
> > On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Christopher Faylor wrote:
        [...]
> > set?  Were I in this position, I'd rather not have to trawl the mail
> > archives.  That's the only mechanism suggested at
> > <http://cygwin.com/contrib.html>.
        [...]
> > Would you accept patches to the contrib page that suggested the use
> > of the existing bugzilla as a resource?  If so, then I'd like to add a table
> > of contents and re-order things a bit as well.
> > 
> > > is going to change that or convince a small team of busy developers to
> > > do your bidding.
> 
> We already have the setup bugzilla in operation.
> I am responsible for incoming tickets, most of them are spam, and trigger the
> developers if there's some update.
> 
> It's additional work and in most of the cases not needed, but in some cases it
> might be useful.

So would you prefer that I NOT suggest a patch to 
    <http://cygwin.com/contrib.html>.
to draw people's attention to the existing Bugzilla?

Else, if you'd like a patch, to whom should I send it?
> 
> The current -p patch is at
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6688
> 
> The name selection filter suggestion not yet.
> 
> And it would be good if the setup.exe suggestion/reports would be posted to
> the right list, which is cygwin-apps, not cygwin!

I could try and work something in to a patch for contrib.html
about that, if it is desired.

> I rather tend to ignore it here.

Understandably.
        Thank you
        Hugh
        

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

