X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <485E7502.3030200@x-ray.at> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:51:30 +0200 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: setup.exe command line parameters References: <485C0309.7080404@bmts.com> <005601c8d39f$3e3cc550$2708a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> In-Reply-To: <005601c8d39f$3e3cc550$2708a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Dave Korn schrieb: > Ralph Hempel wrote on 20 June 2008 20:21: >> Long story short, I ended up using a hacked older version of setup.exe >> that accepted a -p parameter and a list of packages. It worked great! >> >> Is there a compelling reason why that patch can't be applied to the >> current setup and released? Are there security or stability issues >> I'm not thinking about? >> >> That being said, I CAN run setup.exe in unattended quiet mode and >> get a BASE cygwin install done, and I'm quite happy with that. But >> I'd really, really like to specify packages on the command line. >> >> Can I help by offering to update the patch to the current setup? > > Absolutely, yes, please! If you post it to the cygwin-apps list, with a > ChangeLog entry, I'll see what we can do about getting it applied. You mean the patch from http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin.applications/16502 ? -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/