Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {octave,octave-doc,octave-devel}-3.0.1-1   and octave-forge-20080507-1
To: "Yaakov \(Cygwin Ports\)" <yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net>,
   cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <4858032C.3040408@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <603918.5765.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com


--- "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)"  ha scritto:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
> | --- "Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)" ha scritto:
> |> Since .oct files are just DLLs, should they be
> |> treated as such by cygport (and perhaps
> rebaseall)?
> |
> | I am not sure about what you mean.
> | Could you clarify a bit?
> 
> cygport would:
> * strip(1) them before packaging;
> * check them with objdump(1) for binary
> dependencies.
> 
> rebaseall would
> * rebase them together with other .dll and .so
> libraries.
> 
> 
> Yaakov

strip and dependencies are useful in any case.
Strip seems to reduce the oct around 50% less.

Should I add something to my cygport script, or a
patch to cygport package is needed ?

Regards
Marco


      ___________________________________ 
Scopri il Blog di Yahoo! Mail: trucchi, novità, consigli... e la tua opinione!
http://www.ymailblogit.com/blog/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/