X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <47FA9D04.5090803@alice.it> <7z4pacl4fl.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> <47FB9B87.3080202@alice.it> Subject: RE: [ITA] xfig/xfig-lib: An interactive drawing tool Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:46:03 +0100 Message-ID: <00c701c899a8$cc0bcce0$2708a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <47FB9B87.3080202@alice.it> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Angelo Graziosi wrote on 08 April 2008 17:21: > Dr. Volker Zell ha scritto: >> The problem is it does not compile due to dependency on >> >> #include >> >> in w_intersect.c (which we don't have) and later on >> >> w_intersect.c:884: error: syntax error before "ix1c" >> w_intersect.c:885: error: syntax error before "iy1c" >> w_intersect.c:886: error: syntax error before "ix2c" >> w_intersect.c:887: error: syntax error before "iy2c" >> w_intersect.c:891: error: `iy1c' undeclared (first use in this function) >> w_intersect.c:891: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only >> once w_intersect.c:891: error: for each function it appears in.) >> w_intersect.c:891: error: `_Complex_I' undeclared (first use in this >> function) w_intersect.c:892: error: `ix1c' undeclared (first use in this >> function) w_intersect.c:894: error: `iy2c' undeclared (first use in this >> function) w_intersect.c:895: error: `ix2c' undeclared (first use in this >> function) >> >> Ciao >> Volker > > Today I have played a little with it and have seen... > > Cygwin does not support complex.h ??? > > Obviously this > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/backward/complex.h > > is not valid: it is from the side of C++... Uhm... We have a problem. There's also a C 'complex.h' defined by POSIX (that's why C++ has to supply a backward-compat equivalent - in C++ itself, you'd use the new-style headers that don't have the ".h" suffix), but newlib doesn't support all the features of C99 (which is when that header was introduced). cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/