X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:43:50 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: about cyglsa.dll Message-ID: <20080326144350.GA16865@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <47dbffbd.0b074e0a.309b.fffff98d@mx.google.com> <47DC0556.9080802@byu.net> <47EA40ED.9080909@byu.net> <47EA48DE.3030902@byu.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47EA48DE.3030902@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 07:00:14AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Pasting .sigs verbatim is fair game (ie. if I'm dumb enough to post my own > email address in my .sig, that's my masochism, and I deserve what I get). It's fair game but, in the interests of a succinct discussion, there is absolutely no reason for this to show up in a response. Removing unnecessary bits from email that you are replying to (as I do here) is really a good idea. Adding the email address, subject, or other header information (with the exception of date) also just adds clutter to a message for no apparent gain. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/