X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: References: <20080318232317.GA22446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <47E05D4D.8000000@byu.net> <20080319040517.GD22446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080319042138.GF22446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Subject: RE: FAQ suggestion Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:57:41 -0500 Message-ID: <000301c88986$252eb4a0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > From: Dan Kegel > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I assume that they are either trying to 1) cheat, 2) bend > the rules, > > 3) not spend any time whatsoever worrying about the problem, or 4) > > become annoyed because they have thought about it for > thirty seconds > > and it seems like we're purposely trying to punish them. > > I have to think the question comes up frequently, else it > wouldn't elicit such a strong reaction. > > > But, yes, sure, a FAQ entry would not be a bad idea. > > OK, I'm game: [snip] Allow me to be the first to thank you, Dan, for contributing to the Cygwin documentation (or attempting to at any rate). While I of course cannot speak for anyone else, I am sure that all other professionals here appreciate your efforts. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/