X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <0D526FF1B82A477FAF800651863DFAEA@peacekeeper> From: "Bobby McNulty" To: References: <001801c888ec$2aaa6a90$0301a8c0@cal.riotinto.org> Subject: Re: gmp/mpfr status Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:02:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com -------------------------------------------------- From: "David Billinghurst" Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:35 AM To: Subject: RE: gmp/mpfr status >> From: NightStrike >> >> Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages >> will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc? Really, I >> guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think >> mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2. >> > > I have working packages of gmp-4.2.2 and mpfr-2.3.1. I will try and > upload > them this weekend. > > I have been going nuts trying to get gmp 4.2.2 to work. thanks for doing this, David. Much appreciated. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/