X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References:  <200802181525.m1IFPlBS035653@member.newsguy.com> <001601c8729a$8b72dd70$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>  <loom.20080220T144900-251@post.gmane.org>
Subject: RE: Cygwin setup: DL rate should show as  kB/s not kb/s ?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:03:13 -0600
Message-ID: <000d01c87425$890afdb0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:  <loom.20080220T144900-251@post.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

> From: Bill Meier
> 
> Gary R. Van Sickle writes:
> 
> > 
> > > From:  Bill Meier
> > > or maybe KB/s for kilobytes/sec ?
> > > 
> > 
> > It should be an option, but that begs an "Options..." dialog, which 
> > doesn't exist.
> > 
> 
> 
> Unfortunately I didn't express myself clearly in my original message.
> 
> The numeric DLL rate shown by the Cygwin setup program is 
> actually in units of K Bytes/sec and thus either kB/s or KB/s 
> should be used as the text following the numeric rate.
> 

Ohhh, oh oh oh, ok.  Yeah, then I suppose kB/s is the correct way to go, if
my SI serves me right (and please, no "kibbis", lordy).

My point stands though: it would be a useful addition to have this
user-selectable, as in some other file transfer programs.  But my
counterpoint also stands: no options dialog.

> Looking at the code I also note that maybe the 2nd sprintf 
> should be changed to use %03.1f to be consistent with the 1st 
> sprintf ...
> 

Ooof, still using C string manipulation I see.  That brings back some
memories....

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

