X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: iconv vs. libiconv confusion
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:56:53 -0000
Message-ID: <002b01c86cdf$ddb20f40$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com



  Does anyone understand the difference between iconv_open and libiconv_open,
and why the libiconv package supplies a header that declares only iconv_XXX
and a library that defines only libiconv_XXXX?  I find this confusing, and so
does ./configure and friends.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/