X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:37:36 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Uninstalling Cygwin Message-ID: <20080209033735.GA5213@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20080208152939.GD31070@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <47AC9E75.3050709@free.fr> <20080208184038.GA2996@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <47AD00AA.3050501@etr-usa.com> <47AD0525.101427C@dessent.net> <47AD138E.3070407@etr-usa.com> <47AD1903.90E6284B@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47AD1903.90E6284B@dessent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 07:07:47PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote: >Warren Young wrote: >>We have a behavioral psychology problem here, not a technology problem: >>if the item of interest isn't on the first page of results, many will >>stop looking right there and post to the mailing list. They've done >>their bit, and looked in the FAQ, right? > >And what I'm (apparently, poorly) trying to say is that we should only >have links to the no-chunks version so that it's impossible to get >confused as there's only one choice. We can leave the chunked pages on >the server so that old links continue to work, but I really don't see >why they are useful, specifically for the reason the poster expressed. I made nochunks the default about half an hour ago. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/