X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <47A614EC.1010104@verizon.net> <20080204103512.GA5866@calimero.vinschen.de> <47A782C7.3060501@verizon.net> <20080204222455.GA3058@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Subject: RE: Memory leak problem reported with gfortran Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:20:24 -0000 Message-ID: <02fa01c86795$48d202d0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20080204222455.GA3058@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 04 February 2008 22:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:25:27PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote: >> The test also appears very clean on Linux. The gfortran library is >> implemented in C. I need to examine some dumps from the compiler and I >> will get back with you off list if I don't spot the problem. > > I am fairly certain that Corinna would want to keep any correspondence > on-list. > > Also, in case it isn't clear, Cygwin malloc is just Doug Lea's version > of malloc v2.8.3 with very few changes. > > cgf Since I'm currently building gcc4 to check out some autogen-vs-fixinc changes, I'll build fortran as well and take a look at the testcase too. I'd guess that's it's probably a libgfortran problem, since it affects both cygwin *and* mingw, but I'll take a look at it under a debugger and see if I can help. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/