X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <67.92.189.42.1199834929.wm@webmail.inode.at> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:28:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: perl-5.10.0-1 [EXPERIMENTAL] From: "Reini Urban" To: In-Reply-To: <4782FC5C.4050409@byu.net> References: <4773E162.7030503@x-ray.at> <4782FC5C.4050409@byu.net> X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com > According to Reini Urban on 12/27/2007 10:31 AM: > | A diff of the modules from 5.8 to 5.10 is below. > | Module::Build is definitely now in CORE. > > So I should be prepared to mark perl-module-build as an obsolete package > once perl is no longer experimental? Obsolete it only when the perl 5.8 prev version will be deleted. When perl-5.10 will go curr, then an empty perl-module-build or even the same tar.gz will do. I believe it will be in about two weeks or so. One major performance bug was just found and fixed, which will require a 5.10.0-3 release, and the Win32::GUI::Scintilla crash fix (cygwin only) is also outstanding. Your old 5.8 build does no harm to the 5.10 perl. We do not have vendor_perl/5.8 in the new @INC. -- Reini -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/