X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:33:55 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Cygport bug: autoconf 2.6x check fails 2.61. Message-ID: <20071207193355.GB20656@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <82wsrubplj.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> <060901c838f5$51c0c530$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <060901c838f5$51c0c530$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:19:26PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 07 December 2007 17:09, Dean Scarff wrote: > >- x2.6[0-9]) >+ x2.6[0-9]*) > > > I don't see why both of those regexes wouldn't successfully match '2.61' >already. Your patch looks like it's trying to make the regex accept "2.6" >with no second digit after the decimal place as well. Can you perhaps >clarify? Minor point of order: that's not a regex. It's a shell glob. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/