X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4725D805.2C412C94@dessent.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:54:29 -0700
From: Brian Dessent <brian@dessent.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: llrint implementation in Cygwin
References: <fd68u2$geo$1@sea.gmane.org> <46F6C151.3070301@computer.org> <loom.20071029T111515-144@post.gmane.org> <4725D1BA.C2D2ED8A@dessent.net> <033e01c81a2a$30ae3150$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

Dave Korn wrote:

>   I don't think it was being advocated in general, but I think it's reasonable
> to assume that a pure const function like llrint isn't going to do anything
> wacky.

Yes, I realize it was probably not a worry in this particular case, but
I didn't want somebody stumbling on the archives at a later date and
getting the bright idea that you could just go around extracting random
objects from a MinGW library for use in a Cygwin link.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/