X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4713B0ED.3000704@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:26:53 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070505 Remi/2.0.0.0-3.fc4.remi Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Best AVS to use with cygwin References: <1192470972.29928.28.camel@raker.ateb.com> <20071015181743.GD14543@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20071015181743.GD14543@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:56:12PM -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: >> I've yet to have any problems with >> >> http://www.avira.com/en/products/personal.html > > Ditto. I have used avira for years myself. > > Would we get into trouble if we had a "recommended virus checker" web > page at the cygwin site? Or, maybe it would be a "Known working virus checkers". Seems to me that it would be fair to provide a list of virus checkers and their versions that are known to not interfere with Cygwin. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/