X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Diego Biurrun Subject: Re: llrint implementation in Cygwin Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:50:11 +0200 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <46F6C151.3070301@computer.org> <46FEC886.7020007@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217 In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Diego Biurrun wrote: > [...] > > So all in all you have refuted some points I never made, while bungling > some of the research used to substantiate your claims. What is the > point you are trying to prove here? To be a bit more precise and constructive: We have had workarounds of all sorts in the codebase but have been working hard to eliminate them, especially over the last year or so. To achieve this we have put an embargo on new workarounds, whatever gets freshly added has to be minimally intrusive and strictly based on feature checks, not on OS checks, version checks and similar things. best regards Diego -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/