To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcc does not know about "new" and "delete"
References: <46F40C47.3040005@research.telcordia.com> 	<46F4741F.80108@pacific.net.sg> 	<w3fy17l9em.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> 	<20070922035357.GA25395@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> 	<crfy17t1rr.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> 	<20070922185521.GA27706@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
From: Markus E L <ls-cygwin-2006@m-e-leypold.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:07:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20070922185521.GA27706@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher  Faylor's message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:55:21 -0400")
Message-ID: <8ktzpma58n.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com


Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Markus E L wrote:
>>> There are potentially other libraries which might be required for
>>> C++.  You really should use g++ to link C++ programs.
>>
>>Right. I never said differently.
>
> If you want to get technical, I didn't say that you did.
>
> Your message could be taken as implying that an alternate way to link
> c++ programs was to just add -lstdc++ to the command line.  I wanted to

Ah, no. I hope nobody drew that (wrong) conclusion. Actually I only
answered into that thread -- which originally I perceived as
completely resolved -- because I thought the last post (by Erich
Dollansky) showed a slightly wrong picture of the role of the gcc
driver.

> make sure that we didn't see subsequent email from someone who thought
> that was a good way to link c++ programs.

Thank's for watching out for such possibilities and forestalling any
misunderstandings.

Regards -- M


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/