X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:05:21 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: sftp removing writable bit Message-ID: <20070917150521.GB994@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <000901c7f7e1$27fec9e0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:09:41PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >> [snip] >> >> Cygwin Content-O-Meter(tm), as of a few dozen posts in this thread ago: >> >> +-----------+ >> | 0% 100% | >> | \ | >> | \ | >> | \ | >> | O | >> +-----------+ >> >> Too bad nobody polices such things. > >Does your reader of choice lack functionality for skipping a particular >thread that you find uninteresting? Who's holding a gun to your head >and forcing you to read? STFU OK? Gary's evaluation of the situation was correct. This thread has devolved into an uninteresting argument about whether sftp is useful to you or not. What you don't seem to be getting is that no one besides you finds this very interesting. Give it a rest please. The discussion was over several messages ago. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/