X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:15:05 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: permissions/owners seen on cygwin-client vs. server
Message-ID: <20070817071505.GL28407@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <46C4E173.2070508@tlinx.org> <46C4E67F.50709@cygwin.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46C4E67F.50709@cygwin.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Aug 16 20:06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Linda Walsh wrote:
> >I get two different views of my server's "/home" directory
> >depending on if I'm on the server or under cygwin on a client.
> >
> >On the server, I see things like:
> >drwsrwsrwt   2 lin      users       14 Nov 24  2006 NT_Perflogs/
> >drwxr-s---   2 root     private     24 Jul 26  2006 archive/
> >drwsr-s---   4 backup   backup      94 May 14 13:53 backup/
> >[...]
> >
> >but locally, I see:
> >drwxr-x--- 1 lin Administrators 0 Nov 24  2006 NT_Perflogs/
> >drwxr-x--- 1 lin Administrators 0 Jul 26  2006 archive/
> >drwxr-x--- 1 lin Administrators 0 May 14 13:53 backup/
> [...]
> >--------
> >So why such a difference?
> 
> Quite a bit, I'm afraid.  Linda, you've been around long enough that
> we shouldn't have to ask for basic information like cygcheck output
> and other bootstrap information.  What, exactly, is this server?
> How are you connecting to it from the client?  What protocols are
> involved?  How have you configured them?  All this information
> at least is necessary for someone here to start providing any useful
> feedback.  Without it, all we can do is guess.  Don't make us guess.
> It's not very accurate. ;-)

Larry is right, of course, but I make a wild guess, nevertheless:

  CYGWIN=nosmbntsec

See the user guide.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

