From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References:  <f9hv1n$b4a$1@sea.gmane.org> <2D9E96311DCA4C48BF185EA6928BC7BB023875BA@asc-mail.int.ascribe.com> <f9i3d5$sic$1@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: RE: RE:  Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:48:13 +0100
Message-ID: <042701c7db6e$3e295490$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To: <f9i3d5$sic$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote:

> * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100)
>> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM::
>>> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't
>>> know what I and Ronald were talking about.
>> 
>> If you re-read what was posted, you'll find I was totally correct
>> and addressed the points raised:
> 
> This was more or less my fault as I did not read Ronald's article
> carefully enough. 

  Or to paraphrase, "Oh!  It was *me* who didn't know what Ronald was talking about, not /you/ after all!"

  Phil, I think that's probably the nearest thing to an apology you're going to get.  That 'more or less' qualifier makes it look a bit grudging, I must say, I guess it'll have to do ...

> As a matter of fact I stopped reading his article
> after the line where he says d does not read ~/.d.conf because this
> matched my own experience.

  Bad practice.  Stopping reading the moment your preconceived expectations have been satisfied is a recipe for leading oneself into self-delusion.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/