X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:53:17 -0700
From: "David A. Case" <case@scripps.edu>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Using 'complex.h' and GCC-3.4.4-3 in Cygwin
Message-ID: <20070726155317.GB1848@scripps.edu>
References: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0707261210050.23382@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it> <46A8845B.2080208@cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46A8845B.2080208@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007, Greg Chicares wrote:

> > $ gcc test_complex_h.c
> > test_complex_h.c:3:21: complex.h: No such file or directory
> 
> I suppose newlib doesn't provide a full C99 implementation yet.

I've had good luck with the c9x-complex package:

    http://www.moshier.net/c9x_readme.html

Of course, you should test carefully yourself, but for me this provides
a "complex.h" header and the associated functions that seem to work fine
with cygwin.

...dave case


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/