X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <20070705145916.GA27040@ednor> Subject: RE: Interference between instances on MS-Windows Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:48:25 +0100 Message-ID: <015001c7bf1b$ecb4e9d0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com On 05 July 2007 16:33, Bob McConnell wrote: > If I read this right, you are saying there are no reported conflicts in > pthread resources between multiple processes. That is all I wanted to > know. I don't like to waste time diagnosing known problems and then be > told much later that there is an easy workaround. > > I wasn't asking anyone to debug either my code or Cygwin. All I was > asking is if there are any known threading issues in this situation. I > have no idea how you implemented pthreads, nor do I care. Just knowing > that this may be covering new ground is adequate. Well yeh, but there might be /unknown/ problems in the pthreads code, which we'd love to fix if we knew they were there. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/